"Can/did you ask the Acolyte..."
"Can/did you ask the Acolyte..."
Since posting about the successful communication with the Acolyte via Luma Viride - I've received lots of questions basically related to getting further information from the Acolyte. Many of you know my belief that "it never hurts to ask"... so why don't we collect these questions here on this thread, and hope that some formal answers are received? Please post questions for the Acolyte below.
Note: This is just an attempt, there is no formal agreement or arrangement she will answer.
Edgar Allan Wright Hank Johnson H. Richard Loeb Andrew Krug Linda B
Since posting about the successful communication with the Acolyte via Luma Viride - I've received lots of questions basically related to getting further information from the Acolyte. Many of you know my belief that "it never hurts to ask"... so why don't we collect these questions here on this thread, and hope that some formal answers are received? Please post questions for the Acolyte below.
Note: This is just an attempt, there is no formal agreement or arrangement she will answer.
Edgar Allan Wright Hank Johnson H. Richard Loeb Andrew Krug Linda B
I would like to know just how she had grown so close to Roland Jarvis to the point that she was able to surpass him as the spiritual leader of the Enlightenment.
ReplyDeleteI would also like to know what knowledge she possesses on the matter of Mazz and her untimely demise.
Is there a connection between goruck and these artifacts?
ReplyDeleteI understand that the Acolyte has provided her information to you in exchange for images of Harlan's cache and that, having agreed upon the price of goods to be exchanged it is too late to honorably add conditions to the physical examination she requested to complete the deal. I'd like to think it's possible, though, to request that the Acolyte share something more as a goodwill gesture. She holds many secrets and shedding a little light would go a long way towards earning the trust of Enlightened agents in the field.
ReplyDeleteIf she refuses that's certainly her right as she has no obligation to reward beyond the agreed upon price but at the conclusion of this transaction we find that she's in the same position as before - a woman with certain resources, perhaps able to tap into great stores of knowledge but surrounded by no small amount of suspicion and doubt. Two mattes in particular prevent us from truly extending her trust.
The two matters are these: What truly happened to Mazz around the time the Acolyte established control of the Jarvis Center for Enlightenment and Society for the Ethical Treatment of AIs ? What is the current state of Roland Jarvis now that the sensitives have been respawned as simulacra?
Answering those questions would let her complete this transaction in a far stronger position for the future. Even sharing enough information to narrow the scope of our speculation might go a long way to reducing the suspicions of those she might call upon for help in the future.
Luma Viride 's g+ profile shows us a spanned bow in her background picture. This could lead us to the assumption that the obsidian tip is an Arrowhead nor a spear tip. So my question to the Acolyte would be, what's going to happen in the chamber beneath CERN?
ReplyDeletePhilipp J. Bock that's Cupid's span in San Francisco on that picture
ReplyDeleteYou're right Michael Rother could this lead us to another deadrop hidden down in Frisco, somewhere around Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen's sculpture? You could ask the Acolyte.
ReplyDeleteI would echo the questions of Mustafa Said and Mike Wissinger in particular. The fact that Enlightened agents found turning over a strategic find to the putative leader of the Enlightenment shows that there is a profound trust issue. Any information the Acolyte could share about her relationship to Jarvis and her vision for the future of the Enlightened would go a deal to establish trust and confidence in her leadership.
ReplyDeleteI would like to know what The Acolyte believes the relationship is between 13MAGNUS and the Enlightened.
What is her name and why doesn't she use it? Does she believe, as some do, that knowledge of a name is power?
ReplyDeleteMichael Flood That made me think of something.
ReplyDeleteH. Richard Loeb.
Verity Seke.
We know that before hand they were using pseudonyms(P.A Chapeau and X respectively). Why?
Because they didn't want their identities to be known. But there's another thing:
Both of them were tied to incredibly important elements in our Investigation.
Loeb being outed as both a essential individual who was responsible for being at Niantic, hired by the NIA with the goal of tuning A Detection Algorithm.
And Verity was important because she was revealed to be Truthseeker, a powerful AI that Loeb built before Niantic that would later be used as a 'living subconsciousness' within ADA.
Is it possible that the Acolyte is keeping her real name hidden because, like the two listed above, her real name could reveal something of great importance to us all? Could she be far more tied into this Investigation than just being the Acolyte, the spiritual leader of the Enlightened, #13MAGNUS and the Society for the Ethical Treatment of AIs?
I mentioned this in another thread, how does she know she has less information to give unless she knows what all the information is and refuses to share some of it? Then the next question is, how does she know the rest of the information? Does she have spies, direct contact or what? It makes me want to know how she knows what she knows.
ReplyDelete